· alex-reichert · Education  · 4 min read

Provably Fair vs Traditional RNG: Which Casino System is Better?

Understand the key differences between provably fair verification and traditional RNG certification. Learn why crypto casinos are changing the trust equation.

Understand the key differences between provably fair verification and traditional RNG certification. Learn why crypto casinos are changing the trust equation.

When evaluating online casinos, one of the most important factors is game fairness. Traditional casinos rely on RNG (Random Number Generation) certification, while crypto-native casinos often use provably fair systems. But what’s the actual difference, and which should you trust?

How Traditional RNG Works

Traditional online casinos use certified Random Number Generators to determine game outcomes. Here’s the process:

  1. The casino implements an RNG system - Usually a software algorithm like Mersenne Twister
  2. A third-party auditor tests the system - Companies like eCOGRA, iTech Labs, or GLI
  3. The auditor certifies fairness - Based on statistical analysis of outcomes
  4. Regular audits continue - Typically monthly or quarterly

The key point: you must trust the auditor’s certification. You cannot verify individual game outcomes yourself.

How Provably Fair Works

Provably fair gaming uses cryptographic techniques to let players verify each outcome independently:

  1. Before you bet, the casino shows you a hash of the server seed
  2. You provide (or accept) a client seed that influences the outcome
  3. After betting, you can reveal the server seed and verify:
    • The hash matches the original commitment
    • The outcome was calculated correctly from both seeds

The key point: you can mathematically verify every single game result without trusting anyone.

Technical Comparison

AspectTraditional RNGProvably Fair
VerificationTrust auditorVerify yourself
TransparencyPeriodic auditsPer-game proof
ManipulationTheoretically possibleMathematically impossible
ComplexityHidden from playerOpenly documented
Cost to CasinoExpensive auditsComputational only

The Trust Problem with RNG

Traditional RNG certification has inherent limitations:

Audit Gaps: Audits happen periodically, not continuously. Between audits, manipulation is theoretically possible.

Selective Testing: Auditors test samples of outcomes, not every single game. Statistical flukes could go unnoticed.

Conflict of Interest: Casinos pay auditors for certification. While reputable auditors maintain independence, the relationship creates potential pressure.

Hidden Implementation: Players must trust that the certified RNG is actually being used in production, not a modified version.

Why Provably Fair is Superior

Provably fair eliminates trust assumptions through mathematics:

Continuous Verification: Every single game can be verified, not just audit samples.

Cryptographic Commitment: The server seed hash, published before betting, creates an unbreakable commitment. The casino cannot change the outcome after seeing your bet.

Open Algorithms: The calculation method is public. Anyone can verify the implementation.

No Third Party: Verification doesn’t require trusting auditors, regulators, or the casino itself.

Limitations of Provably Fair

To be fair (pun intended), provably fair has some limitations:

Player Responsibility: You must actually verify outcomes for the system to catch manipulation. Most players don’t verify regularly.

Implementation Varies: Different casinos implement provably fair differently. Some implementations are more robust than others.

Not All Games: Third-party games (from providers like Pragmatic Play) typically use RNG, not provably fair. Only casino-original games usually offer verification.

Complexity: Understanding SHA-256 hashes and seed combinations requires technical knowledge that many players don’t have.

Which Games Typically Offer Provably Fair?

Provably fair is most common in:

  • Crash games - Hash chain verification
  • Dice games - Simple hash-to-number conversion
  • Plinko - Sequential bit verification
  • Mines - Predetermined mine positions
  • Card games - Deck shuffle verification

Third-party slots and live dealer games almost always use traditional RNG instead.

Real-World Verification Example

Here’s how verification works for a typical dice game:

Server Seed: 7f83b1657ff1fc53b92dc18148a1d65dfc2d4b1fa3d677284addd200126d9069
Client Seed: player123
Nonce: 42

Combined: HMAC-SHA256(server_seed, client_seed:nonce)
Result Hash: a3b8f2...
First 8 hex chars: a3b8f2e1
Decimal: 2747,859,681
Roll: 2747859681 % 10000 / 100 = 47.81

You can run this calculation yourself to verify the casino didn’t manipulate your roll.

Our Recommendation

For maximum trust and transparency, we recommend:

  1. Choose provably fair casinos for games that support verification
  2. Occasionally verify outcomes to ensure the system works as advertised
  3. For third-party games, look for casinos with reputable RNG certifications (eCOGRA, GLI, iTech Labs)
  4. Avoid casinos that claim fairness but provide no verification method or certification

The ideal casino offers provably fair for original games and licensed, audited third-party games for variety.

Conclusion

Provably fair represents a significant advancement in casino transparency. While traditional RNG certification isn’t inherently dishonest, it requires trust in third parties. Provably fair eliminates this trust requirement through mathematics, giving players unprecedented ability to verify fairness.

As the crypto casino industry matures, we expect provably fair to become the standard for original games, while third-party providers may eventually adopt similar verification systems.


For a step-by-step guide on verifying provably fair outcomes, see our How to Verify Provably Fair Games guide.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »